Background
The Iberian Society of Ecology (SIBECOL) brings together scientists and professionals from all areas of Ecology with the aim of placing Ecology at the centre of our society.
The aim of this project call is to support early postdoc career ecologists by: (i) providing them funding opportunities, and (ii) promoting multi- and interdisciplinary research in Ecology. Proposals can be led by one or two PIs and must be related to empirical or theoretical ecology of aquatic or terrestrial ecosystems. To promote multi- and interdisciplinarity, those proposals that integrate the study of more than one ecosystem (terrestrial, freshwater, marine) or that have a theoretical or methodological orientation, which transcends the borders of these types of ecosystems will be positively valued.
To do so, SIBECOL opens a call for original projects in Ecology, divided into two categories:
– Starting early career researchers project grant (Starting ECR) (One grant of 3000 €).
– Advanced early career researchers project grant (Advanced ECR) (One grant of 4000 €).
Requirements of candidates and participants
Candidates:
To apply for this call, all candidates, regardless of the category, must meet the following requirements:
Project requirements, duration and team assembly
All projects, independently of the category, must meet the following requirements:
Budget
The budget may cover consumables and non-consumables, travel expenses required exclusively for the development of the project, and publication costs in journals associated with scientific societies. Conference registration fees to present results of the project are also allowed. In that case, SIBECOL meetings are preferable. Salaries cannot be paid by the budget. Eligible costs should be specified in the proposal according to the objectives of the project.The coordinator of each awarded project will receive 100% of the total budget at the beginning of the project. SIBECOL will pay the corresponding IRPF taxes without detriment of the subsidized amount. The coordinator of each project must declare the income in the corresponding annual income tax declaration.
Application procedure
The CV format is free, but it should contain: academic path, list of publications (both published and in preparation) and projects (indicate whether the applicant was the coordinator or not). The existence of the necessary expertise to lead and perform the proposed project by PIs should be clearly justified. CVs should not be longer than four pages each.
The fact of applying for the present call for SIBECOL Projects for ECRs (2025) implies (i) the acceptance by the applicants of its bases and its resolution, which could not be appealed, and (ii) the resignation of any type of claim. All principal investigators must sign a responsibility statement (at the end of the project application form), stating that all the above mentioned requirements are fulfilled.
Project Evaluation
After the deadline of the project submission, the proposals will be collated and sent to an Evaluation Panel. The panel will be constituted by three members. SIBECOL Committee Board will nominate evaluators among ecologists from different disciplines covered by each project. The selection of the Evaluation Panel will seek for gender balance and ensure no conflict of interest with any of the project proposals, nor candidates. The SIBECOL Committee Board will nominate an expert to supervise the evaluation process and ensure no incompatibilities between evaluators and projects.
The evaluation of proposals will follow the guidelines marked by the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA; read guidelines https://sfdora.org/read/). The projects submitted will be reviewed by the panel and evaluated based on the following general and specific criteria.
General criteria (yes or no query):
– The scientific quality of the project (reasoning, objectives and hypotheses) and its development will certainly contribute to improve the current understanding of Ecology.
– The project is feasible considering methodology, working plan, timeline and requested budget.
Specific criteria (score-based criteria)
– Project multi- or interdisciplinarity. Proposals that integrate the study of more than one ecosystem (terrestrial, freshwater, marine), that have a theoretical and/or methodological orientation where disciplines work side by side on a common issue to solve a common objective (multidisciplinarity), or where the approach consists of a collaboration among different disciplines that integrate their perspectives, methods, and concepts to address a common issue or objective (interdisciplinarity), will be positively valued (Max. 20 points).
– Scientific merit, innovative nature, relevance and originality of the project (Max. 50 points).
– The project is feasible. The items to be considered are: (i) the expertise of the PIs (based on their CVs); the experimental design and methodology; and (ii) the organization of the project in terms of time, material and human resources. The likely availability of all necessary materials to carry out the different parts of the project (field work, laboratory analyses, etc.) will be considered (Max. 10 points).
– CV evaluation of the PIs based only on scientific trajectory, considering all together publications, databases, software development, coordination and involvement in previous research projects, mentoring, etc.. (Max. 20 points).
Evaluation process:
General and specific criteria will be used to evaluate the projects in three stages:
– Phase 1: Projects will be evaluated based on the general criteria. To pass to the second phase, projects must get a positive evaluation in all items.
– Phase 2: Pre-selected projects will be evaluated based on the specific criteria. Evaluators will grade every criterion according to the abovementioned scores. Finally, the total score assigned to each project by all evaluators will be averaged.
– Phase 3: The project with the highest score of each modality will be selected and granted. The decision of the panel will be announced in November. An email will be sent to the PI or coordinator of the project and the resolution will be published on SIBECOL’s website and its official social media. Applicants can request an evaluation report of their project to SIBECOL Secretary.
Project development, outputs and commitments
The Committee Board of SIBECOL will review the progress of the projects and will ensure the projects are carried out following the proposals and the rules established in this call.
The deliverables of the projects are:
– A scientific report indicating the activities carried out and the results obtained (no longer than 5 pages). This report must be sent to SIBECOL by the end of the official time framework.
– PIs should commit to publish one publication in a peer-review journal. This publication is not subjected to the official time framework of 2 years. It can occur anytime afterwards. All participants in the research will be considered as potential co-authors in the project outputs.
Besides, the PI or the coordinator of each awarded project must:
– Sign a letter of acceptance of the funding and associated responsibilities.
– Acknowledge SIBECOL funding in any deliverable, publication or outreach activity.
– Ensure project funds are used in accordance to what is specified in the proposal.
– Submit a final report about all expenses based on the awarded funding. The report must contain supporting documents for the payments (tickets, receipts or invoices). Both the scientific and expenses report must be sent to the secretary of SIBECOL by January 31st, 2028.
Other regulations
– SIBECOL reserves the right to not grant any of the project categories, if: (i) there are no proposals for any of them; (ii) the submitted proposals do not reach the minimum level established by the evaluation criteria.
– For a period of 48 months since projects are granted, SIBECOL reserves the right to revoke any of them and (ii) to claim the reimbursement of the whole funding, if the infraction of any of the call rules is proved.

